25 Comments »

sjh7132 said:
@ MjndblainDe couse it’s wrong, it’s a simulation.
# 27 March 2010 at 6:26 pm

poobass said:
lol more like seconds the computer is amazing if you’ve never been on a
# 27 March 2010 at 6:29 pm

rustyATV said:
Computer time. It reduces the number of iterations you have to do. Studies have shown that companies invest in software simulation spend less on research and have shorter time on the market, either jumbo jets, cars, or golf balls.
# 27 March 2010 at 7:02 pm

amidunet said:
Magnus effect?
# 27 March 2010 at 7:18 pm

mjndblain said:
THIS IS FAKE AND GAY
# 27 March 2010 at 7:56 pm

iceboks said:
He did not mention backspin.
# 27 March 2010 at 8:06 pm

thesparitan said:
it works with any theory of fluid dynamics, because if it works for Newtonian fluids like water. While there, they should use this design of ships and submarines.
# 27 March 2010 at 8:34 pm

pbs520 said:
Could you make a model to assess the effect of golf ball on a car as seen in Mythbusters? I think the dimpled golf ball should be placed in strategic locations. Refer to the vortex generator jet fighter for a preview. The idea is to improve energy efficiency.
# 27 March 2010 at 8:53 pm

sjh7132 said:
I do not know what is currently less costly, hours of super computer time or drilling holes in a ball and knock.
# 27 March 2010 at 9:12 pm

AlexIsonSanders said:
coool
# 27 March 2010 at 9:17 pm

MrPedrogolf said:
wonder if thats true daves voice?? ha ha ha
# 27 March 2010 at 9:54 pm

iStraww said:
w’H'at form. her voice is annoying.
# 27 March 2010 at 9:54 pm

JollyGreenGordo said:
Was there a bullet or rocket made with this idea? I know that swimming and running charges were made.
# 27 March 2010 at 10:24 pm

Joseph1A1 said:
It helps manufacturers of golf balls to learn more about atmospheric drag on golf balls, allowing them to create better quality balls, you can feel longer. . . . . is how
# 27 March 2010 at 11:19 pm

clopezhuici said:
You raison.C is funny, I do not even remember posting this vid, or watch this question. Must have been a night of crap hehe
# 27 March 2010 at 11:22 pm

Danzaslap16 said:
if you listen to the beginning of the video, it shows that they already knew, but allows the computer to visualize and quantify the effect that the dimples have. If they can not quantify it, they can improve the depth, size and number of dimples are the best on a golf ball to go farther. When Daimler designed the gasoline engine at first in the late 1800s, he did this without a computer, but look at what computers have done to the engine fuel today. . .
# 27 March 2010 at 11:53 pm

bullrunner2005 said:
helpful, but how it will help me to beat them longer? It does not.
# 28 March 2010 at 12:19 am

sanders924 said:
who. . . . . . concerns. . . . . .
# 28 March 2010 at 12:27 am

nsmuller1 said:
Gay
# 28 March 2010 at 1:22 am

bobzilla211 said:
then maybe they should do with trains, cars and planes?
# 28 March 2010 at 2:06 am

clopezhuici said:
though they knew it all without the need for a computer to explain a hundred years ago when they conceived. . .
# 28 March 2010 at 2:56 am

illusionkid54 said:
it was also called nonhooker happy, but became illegal.
# 28 March 2010 at 3:16 am

itssuaves said:
you got that right. . .
# 28 March 2010 at 4:14 am

itssuaves said:
umm. . . yeah we care too acuraccy bud. . .
# 28 March 2010 at 4:37 am

1Ravangers1 said:
dasn which relaxed me:)
# 28 March 2010 at 5:31 am

Leave your response!

latest coments

• rocklax123 on Lee Trevino check wedge golf swing
• richtawee2007 on Lee Trevino check wedge golf swing
• empettit123 on Lee Trevino check wedge golf swing
• drummerkingmike on Lee Trevino check wedge golf swing
• richtawee2007 on Lee Trevino check wedge golf swing

pages

• About

Categories

• featured
• gold club sets
• golf drivers
• golf fairway wods
• golf irons
• golf Putters
• Golf Shoes
• headline
• Nike